Apache Takes Out Insurgents In Iraq With Missiles - Video
Shared via AddThis
Thursday, July 2, 2009
Know what pisses liberals off?
Warporn!
Man, I love watching terrorists get killed. In this one, you can see the terrorist's body flying through the air from the missile strike:
And in this one, a whole truckload of terrorists get an unplanned trip through the air:
Is that awesome or what?
Hope it pisses off some liberals.
Man, I love watching terrorists get killed. In this one, you can see the terrorist's body flying through the air from the missile strike:
And in this one, a whole truckload of terrorists get an unplanned trip through the air:
Is that awesome or what?
Hope it pisses off some liberals.
Wednesday, July 1, 2009
WELL SURPRISE - SURPRISE, BUT WHO KNOWS?
Note the DATE that AP got this info. Have you seen it in the media???? No????? And what has been done about it??? NOTHING!!! WHY???? Is it LEGAL for BO to use campaign funds to pay for legal resources to block disclosure of his personal records????? IN GOD WE TRUST WELL SURPRISE - SURPRISE, BUT WHO KNOWS? April 28, 2009 AP- WASHINGTON D.C. : In a move certain to fuel the debate over Obama's qualifications for the presidency, the group "Americans for Freedom of Information" has Released copies of President Obama's college transcripts from Occidental College . Released today, the transcript indicates that Obama, under the name Barry Soetoro, received financial aid as a foreign student from Indonesia as an undergraduate at the school. The transcript was released by Occidental College in compliance with a court order in a suit brought by the group in the Superior Court of California.. The transcript shows that Obama (Soetoro) applied for financial aid and wasawarded a fellowship for foreign students from the Fulbright FoundationScholarship program.To qualify, for the scholarship, a student must claim foreign citizenship. This document would seem to provide the smoking gun that many of Obama'sdetractors have been seeking. Along with the evidence that he was first born in Kenya and there is no record of him ever applying for US citizenship, this is looking pretty grim. The news has created a firestorm at the White House as the release casts increasing doubt about Obama's legitimacy and qualification to serve as president. When reached for comment in London, where he has been in meetings with British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, Obama smiled but refused comment on the issue. Britain's Daily Mail has also carried the story in a front-page article titled, "Obama Eligibility Questioned," leading some to speculate that the story may overshadow economic issues on Obama's first official visit to the U.K. In a related matter, under growing pressure from several groups, Justice Antonin Scalia announced that the Supreme Court agreed on Tuesday to hear arguments concerning Obama's legal eligibility to serve as President in a case brought by Leo Donofrio of New Jersey . This lawsuit claims Obama's dual citizenship disqualified him from serving as president. Donofrio's case is just one of 18 suits brought by citizens demanding proof of Obama's citizenship or qualification to serve as president. Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation has released the results of their investigation of Obama's campaign spending. This study estimates that Obama has spent upwards of $950,000 in campaign funds in the past year with eleven law firms in 12 states for legal resources to block disclosure of any of his personal records. Mr. Kreep indicated that the investigation is still ongoing but that the final report will be provided to the U.S. attorney general, Eric Holder. Mr. Holder has refused to comment on the matter. LET OTHER FOLKS KNOW THIS NEWS THAT THE MEDIA WON'T REPORT! WHY, YOU ASK, WONT THEY REPORT IT? BECAUSE IT WOULD IMPLICATE THEM IN THE GREATEST VOTER FRAUD IN HISTORY THE NEWS MEDIA HAS KNOWN THIS FACT AND A GREAT DEAL MORE FROM THE BEGINNING OF THE OBAMA CAMPAIGN THAT IS THE WAY SOCIALISM OPERATES. THE END JUSTIFIES THE MEANS HONESTY IS NEVER IMPORTANT
And the GOP stands for ...?
Via Dan Riehl, this site asks what the GOP should stand for. Worth a look.
For my money, it should start out with ... you guessed it, sticking it to liberals, instead of trying to make nice with them.
For my money, it should start out with ... you guessed it, sticking it to liberals, instead of trying to make nice with them.
Enjoy the Schadenfreude
Via HotAir, feckless crapweasel/turncoat Snarlin' Arlen "I've Got Marbles In My Throat" Specter is going to face a primary challenge in Pennsylvania after all.
After sticking one final knife in the back of Republicans and seeking refuge with the Democrats, he's going to find out he's not all that welcome over there either.
All those Senators that expect to be serving after 2010, please step forward. Um, not so fast, Mr. Specter.
After sticking one final knife in the back of Republicans and seeking refuge with the Democrats, he's going to find out he's not all that welcome over there either.
All those Senators that expect to be serving after 2010, please step forward. Um, not so fast, Mr. Specter.
The Palin Food Fight
The blogosphere is buzzing today over the intra-GOP food fight regarding Sarah Palin. Politico gleefully chimes in here. The Other McCain takes on one aspect of the fight in this post, with a few other assorted posts on this topic as well. HotAir has this among their posts on the subject. And I have some of my own thoughts here.
1) The liberals and the mainstream media (but I repeat myself) are scared sh*tless of Palin. Oh, they'll tell you they're not and say they hope we nominate her in 2012 (assuming she runs), but that's nothing more than reverse psychology. Otherwise, why the obsession with a VP candidate of a losing ticket? For those of you old enough to remember, ask yourself this: How obsessed were conservatives with Geraldine Ferraro at this point in 1985? If your answer is any more than zero, you've overestimated.
2) In their desperate attempts to destroy her, the liberals and the mainstream media (dammit, repeated myself again) are emptying all of their ammo at once hoping that something, anything, will stick. This "strategy" (if it can be called such a thing) is a classic sign of fear. They've tried and tried, failed and failed again, and now they're ratcheting things up with attacks more desperate (the Vanity Fair piece) and more ugly (the photoshops and other ugly smears of Palin's infant son, Trig) than anything we've seen yet. It seems like a lot of work for a VP candidate of a losing ticket whose candidacy is allegedly DOA.
3) Some bedwetters on the right are worried that all of these attacks on Sarah will make her candidacy dead letter, that she doesn't have a chance, and that she will be Quayle-ized.
Puh. Freakin'. Leeze.
First of all, Palin has more charisma than an arena full of rock stars, the game changing kind of charisma. How else did she attract 20,000 to watch her deliver a speech June 7 in Auburn, NY in order to raise money for a museum dedicated to William Seward? Could Quayle have ever drawn that many to any event? And in the current roster of politicians, who besides President Urkel could draw a crowd like that to an event that's not even associated with a political campaign?
Quayle was also the VP of a failed presidency, one where the lead guy broke his "no new taxes" pledge and thus tanked the economy for a while. It's easy for the unpopularity of the top of the ticket to rub off on the bottom ... unless your name is Sarah Palin (as an aside, does anyone want to bet that a future question in trivial pursuit will center around who Palin's running mate was when she ran for VP in '08?). Oh, and by any objective measure, Palin is both a popular and successful governor.
Throw in the difference of executive experience (Palin - successful governor, Quayle - unsuccessful vice president).
And while I think Quayle was unfairly criticized a lot of the time, he did occasionally gaffe up enough to make his defenders cringe. The "tomatoe" incident really made one wonder if he didn't put the "e" in "ignorant."
So sack up, bedwetters of the right.
4) By 2012, the mainstream media's take on both Obama and Palin will be shot all to hell. In the case of the former, they have built up expectations to a such an extreme level that there is no way he can meet them, which is bound to lead to disappointment. When anyone who's not a flaming liberal evaluates the MSM treatment of Obama come 2012, they will realize that they have no credibility and are ridiculously partisan in his favor. Any semi-objective observer will then wonder why they should believe anything the MSM writes about Palin, especially after all their previous attempts to destroy her have been miserable failures.
5) Finally, a word or two for certain members of McCain's campaign staff, including Steve Schmidt and Nicole Wallace: F*ck you, you f*cking cowardly, backstabbing, ass-covering worthless sacks of pig excrement. Had you been able to keep your knives sheathed and your mouths shut, I might have had some sympathy for what happened in November '08, given that you had a lousy, uninspiring, crotchety old candidate in McCain. But no, you guys had to go and f*ck up the one really good decision he made during the campaign, the one thing that got him back in the race and gave him at least a fighting chance - nominating Palin. Yet instead of sucking it up and taking responsibility for your own screw-ups (e.g., the disastrous rollout, not letting her go on talk radio, etc.), you start all kinds of vicious rumors against Palin, knowing that the MSM will gleefully run with every one of them. Worse, you run to the MSM as "anonymous sources" like the pathetic cowards you are.
Sometimes there's no justice in this world, but if there was, your next job would be fellating homeless winos on the street corner so you could get money to buy crack. That's about all you're worth to the conservative cause.
Oh, and in case I didn't make myself clear, "anonymous" McCain campaign staffers: F*ck you.
1) The liberals and the mainstream media (but I repeat myself) are scared sh*tless of Palin. Oh, they'll tell you they're not and say they hope we nominate her in 2012 (assuming she runs), but that's nothing more than reverse psychology. Otherwise, why the obsession with a VP candidate of a losing ticket? For those of you old enough to remember, ask yourself this: How obsessed were conservatives with Geraldine Ferraro at this point in 1985? If your answer is any more than zero, you've overestimated.
2) In their desperate attempts to destroy her, the liberals and the mainstream media (dammit, repeated myself again) are emptying all of their ammo at once hoping that something, anything, will stick. This "strategy" (if it can be called such a thing) is a classic sign of fear. They've tried and tried, failed and failed again, and now they're ratcheting things up with attacks more desperate (the Vanity Fair piece) and more ugly (the photoshops and other ugly smears of Palin's infant son, Trig) than anything we've seen yet. It seems like a lot of work for a VP candidate of a losing ticket whose candidacy is allegedly DOA.
3) Some bedwetters on the right are worried that all of these attacks on Sarah will make her candidacy dead letter, that she doesn't have a chance, and that she will be Quayle-ized.
Puh. Freakin'. Leeze.
First of all, Palin has more charisma than an arena full of rock stars, the game changing kind of charisma. How else did she attract 20,000 to watch her deliver a speech June 7 in Auburn, NY in order to raise money for a museum dedicated to William Seward? Could Quayle have ever drawn that many to any event? And in the current roster of politicians, who besides President Urkel could draw a crowd like that to an event that's not even associated with a political campaign?
Quayle was also the VP of a failed presidency, one where the lead guy broke his "no new taxes" pledge and thus tanked the economy for a while. It's easy for the unpopularity of the top of the ticket to rub off on the bottom ... unless your name is Sarah Palin (as an aside, does anyone want to bet that a future question in trivial pursuit will center around who Palin's running mate was when she ran for VP in '08?). Oh, and by any objective measure, Palin is both a popular and successful governor.
Throw in the difference of executive experience (Palin - successful governor, Quayle - unsuccessful vice president).
And while I think Quayle was unfairly criticized a lot of the time, he did occasionally gaffe up enough to make his defenders cringe. The "tomatoe" incident really made one wonder if he didn't put the "e" in "ignorant."
So sack up, bedwetters of the right.
4) By 2012, the mainstream media's take on both Obama and Palin will be shot all to hell. In the case of the former, they have built up expectations to a such an extreme level that there is no way he can meet them, which is bound to lead to disappointment. When anyone who's not a flaming liberal evaluates the MSM treatment of Obama come 2012, they will realize that they have no credibility and are ridiculously partisan in his favor. Any semi-objective observer will then wonder why they should believe anything the MSM writes about Palin, especially after all their previous attempts to destroy her have been miserable failures.
5) Finally, a word or two for certain members of McCain's campaign staff, including Steve Schmidt and Nicole Wallace: F*ck you, you f*cking cowardly, backstabbing, ass-covering worthless sacks of pig excrement. Had you been able to keep your knives sheathed and your mouths shut, I might have had some sympathy for what happened in November '08, given that you had a lousy, uninspiring, crotchety old candidate in McCain. But no, you guys had to go and f*ck up the one really good decision he made during the campaign, the one thing that got him back in the race and gave him at least a fighting chance - nominating Palin. Yet instead of sucking it up and taking responsibility for your own screw-ups (e.g., the disastrous rollout, not letting her go on talk radio, etc.), you start all kinds of vicious rumors against Palin, knowing that the MSM will gleefully run with every one of them. Worse, you run to the MSM as "anonymous sources" like the pathetic cowards you are.
Sometimes there's no justice in this world, but if there was, your next job would be fellating homeless winos on the street corner so you could get money to buy crack. That's about all you're worth to the conservative cause.
Oh, and in case I didn't make myself clear, "anonymous" McCain campaign staffers: F*ck you.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)